Opportunities Abound
posted by Mike Coffey
The dawn of a new year is the time of hope. People make resolutions to do better in their lives. They see an opportunity for a clean slate, and want to take advantage of the benefits that slate can give. Some folks have Opportunity knocking at their door today. If they take advantage, it could mean a very prosperous 2009 -- and beyond.
The Line on the Color Bar
The most obvious opportunity is that for Mike Haywood. After biding his time and plying his trade for a number of high-profile programs, he's getting his shot to be the top dog at Miami University. Haywood has served under a number of outstanding coaches, and hopefully has learned at least a little from all of them. He'll now get to show the college football world the results of his schooling, and since you can't have enough Fighting Irish alums in the coaching world, we wish him all the best in his well-earned posting.
But an even bigger opportunity is in the hands of Floyd Keith and the Black Coaches Association. They now have at least three examples -- Haywood, Buffalo's Turner Gill, and DeWayne Walker, who has interviewed strongly for a number of positions and is reportedly the leading candidate at New Mexico State -- they can show to their membership and say, "See, this is how it should be done. This is how you need to do it."
There are far too few African-American head coaches in Division 1A (or the FBS or whatever goofy moniker is used for it these days). The solution, however, is not forcing unprepared candidates into positions and having them flame out. The solution is for African-Americans who want to coach to be given the same opportunity to follow the typical coaching development path as their Caucasian counterparts.
Look at the resumes of Haywood, Gill and Walker, and note the similarities:
All three men got their Bachelor's degrees. Haywood got his the old fashioned way at ND. Gill and Walker went in a slightly more roundabout fashion, but both are in possession of sheepskins. Such degrees are critical for college coaching advancement. So perhaps instead of focusing on the (admittedly poor) low percentage of African-American head coaches, the BCA should focus on the (even more reprehensible) low percentage of African-American football players who finish their eligibility with a college degree. Plantations like Arizona and Michigan and Texas and Georgia, with their horrible performance in graduating African-American football players, especially in comparison to their Caucasian counterparts, should be called on the carpet. That's how you start -- by increasing the pool of available candidates, and letting them get an early start on their coaching careers instead of spending two or three years getting the degree they should have been earning during their playing days.
All three men have experience at multiple levels and multiple positions. Haywood was an assistant for 20 years, progressing from a position coach at Minnesota and Army and Ball State to a Special Teams coordinator at LSU and Texas. Gill was a 17-year assistant at North Texas, SMU, and Nebraska, with the Huskers winning three National Titles during his stint there. Walker has also prowled sidelines for 20 years at places like Oklahoma State, BYU, Cal, USC, and UCLA.
One could argue it should have taken them less than 20 years, but one could also argue there are Caucasian assistants who sometimes wait that long. Pete Carroll's first job as an assistant was in 1973 but wasn't hired by the Jets as HC until 1994. Mark Richt started as a QB coach at FSU in 1985, and it wasn't until 2001 that he got a top job. Bob Stoops started in 1983 and didn't get to Oklahoma until 1999.
All three men have held leadership positions as an assistant. Haywood was ST coordinator twice and then OC at Notre Dame. Gill was Assistant HC at Nebraska. Walker was the DC at UCLA. They had experience overseeing large groups within the team, coordinating recruiting, game-planning, the works. Along with the graduation rates, the BCA should be counting the number of college coordinators of color, because those are the most direct seeds from which head coaches grow.
All three men started (or will start) their head coaching careers at a learning stop. Gill is already turning heads at Buffalo, where he has reformed one of the losing-est programs in recent memory into a MAC threat. Haywood will start at Miami, another MAC school with a strong tradition where a new coach can afford to make teeth-cutting mistakes without it making a bad first impression. Walker is looking at NMSU, and probably will find it easier to learn the intricacies of the HC position in the WAC rather than the spotlight of the Pac-10.
The Line on the Green Bar
Charlie Weis also has an opportunity, one he's been offered before. You don't always get a second bite at the apple, but here we have Weis with what might be his third chance to broaden his horizons on offense.
It remains to be seen which current Notre Dame assistants (if any) will accompany Haywood to Oxford, and it remains to be seen what other current assistants (if any) are relieved of their duties. But change is needed on the offensive side of the ball, and this may be Weis' last opportunity to make it.
The running game remains abysmal. Not to be lost in the otherwise-satisfying 49-21 thrashing of the Warriors in Honolulu was the net 73 yards gained by Irish players on the ground during the contest. While an 85 percent completion rate for your quarterback is a great thing, it's also not something dependable or even usual, and less than 100 yards on the ground against a team of UH's caliber does not bode well.
It's time for Charlie to truly become the leader a head coach needs to be. Leaders hire other leaders, and what Notre Dame needs now is a leader on offense not afraid to tell Weis it's time to run the ball well and not give up on it at the first sign of trouble. By all means, continue to utilize the weapons at QB and WR and TE. But an offense that is not a threat to run eventually falls because teams can sell out to stop the pass, as we saw to our chagrin down the stretch this season.
Weis has to replace his departing OC, and should replace his OL coach whether that departure is voluntary or not. A quality hire of someone(s) with a balanced viewpoint at both positions -- someone like a Mitch Browning, perhaps -- can revitalize the (truly) offensive side of the ball, and with a continuation of improvement on defense, could lead to the results we're looking for in 2009.
Anything else might lead to an opportunity for someone else.
The Line on the Color Bar
The most obvious opportunity is that for Mike Haywood. After biding his time and plying his trade for a number of high-profile programs, he's getting his shot to be the top dog at Miami University. Haywood has served under a number of outstanding coaches, and hopefully has learned at least a little from all of them. He'll now get to show the college football world the results of his schooling, and since you can't have enough Fighting Irish alums in the coaching world, we wish him all the best in his well-earned posting.
But an even bigger opportunity is in the hands of Floyd Keith and the Black Coaches Association. They now have at least three examples -- Haywood, Buffalo's Turner Gill, and DeWayne Walker, who has interviewed strongly for a number of positions and is reportedly the leading candidate at New Mexico State -- they can show to their membership and say, "See, this is how it should be done. This is how you need to do it."
There are far too few African-American head coaches in Division 1A (or the FBS or whatever goofy moniker is used for it these days). The solution, however, is not forcing unprepared candidates into positions and having them flame out. The solution is for African-Americans who want to coach to be given the same opportunity to follow the typical coaching development path as their Caucasian counterparts.
Look at the resumes of Haywood, Gill and Walker, and note the similarities:
All three men got their Bachelor's degrees. Haywood got his the old fashioned way at ND. Gill and Walker went in a slightly more roundabout fashion, but both are in possession of sheepskins. Such degrees are critical for college coaching advancement. So perhaps instead of focusing on the (admittedly poor) low percentage of African-American head coaches, the BCA should focus on the (even more reprehensible) low percentage of African-American football players who finish their eligibility with a college degree. Plantations like Arizona and Michigan and Texas and Georgia, with their horrible performance in graduating African-American football players, especially in comparison to their Caucasian counterparts, should be called on the carpet. That's how you start -- by increasing the pool of available candidates, and letting them get an early start on their coaching careers instead of spending two or three years getting the degree they should have been earning during their playing days.
All three men have experience at multiple levels and multiple positions. Haywood was an assistant for 20 years, progressing from a position coach at Minnesota and Army and Ball State to a Special Teams coordinator at LSU and Texas. Gill was a 17-year assistant at North Texas, SMU, and Nebraska, with the Huskers winning three National Titles during his stint there. Walker has also prowled sidelines for 20 years at places like Oklahoma State, BYU, Cal, USC, and UCLA.
One could argue it should have taken them less than 20 years, but one could also argue there are Caucasian assistants who sometimes wait that long. Pete Carroll's first job as an assistant was in 1973 but wasn't hired by the Jets as HC until 1994. Mark Richt started as a QB coach at FSU in 1985, and it wasn't until 2001 that he got a top job. Bob Stoops started in 1983 and didn't get to Oklahoma until 1999.
All three men have held leadership positions as an assistant. Haywood was ST coordinator twice and then OC at Notre Dame. Gill was Assistant HC at Nebraska. Walker was the DC at UCLA. They had experience overseeing large groups within the team, coordinating recruiting, game-planning, the works. Along with the graduation rates, the BCA should be counting the number of college coordinators of color, because those are the most direct seeds from which head coaches grow.
All three men started (or will start) their head coaching careers at a learning stop. Gill is already turning heads at Buffalo, where he has reformed one of the losing-est programs in recent memory into a MAC threat. Haywood will start at Miami, another MAC school with a strong tradition where a new coach can afford to make teeth-cutting mistakes without it making a bad first impression. Walker is looking at NMSU, and probably will find it easier to learn the intricacies of the HC position in the WAC rather than the spotlight of the Pac-10.
The Line on the Green Bar
Charlie Weis also has an opportunity, one he's been offered before. You don't always get a second bite at the apple, but here we have Weis with what might be his third chance to broaden his horizons on offense.
It remains to be seen which current Notre Dame assistants (if any) will accompany Haywood to Oxford, and it remains to be seen what other current assistants (if any) are relieved of their duties. But change is needed on the offensive side of the ball, and this may be Weis' last opportunity to make it.
The running game remains abysmal. Not to be lost in the otherwise-satisfying 49-21 thrashing of the Warriors in Honolulu was the net 73 yards gained by Irish players on the ground during the contest. While an 85 percent completion rate for your quarterback is a great thing, it's also not something dependable or even usual, and less than 100 yards on the ground against a team of UH's caliber does not bode well.
It's time for Charlie to truly become the leader a head coach needs to be. Leaders hire other leaders, and what Notre Dame needs now is a leader on offense not afraid to tell Weis it's time to run the ball well and not give up on it at the first sign of trouble. By all means, continue to utilize the weapons at QB and WR and TE. But an offense that is not a threat to run eventually falls because teams can sell out to stop the pass, as we saw to our chagrin down the stretch this season.
Weis has to replace his departing OC, and should replace his OL coach whether that departure is voluntary or not. A quality hire of someone(s) with a balanced viewpoint at both positions -- someone like a Mitch Browning, perhaps -- can revitalize the (truly) offensive side of the ball, and with a continuation of improvement on defense, could lead to the results we're looking for in 2009.
Anything else might lead to an opportunity for someone else.
Labels: charlie weis, ncaa football, notre dame football, notre dame football coaches
17 Comments:
That is like saying there are too many black basketball players. Are you a socialist or a capitalist.
urban meyer flew in, in 2005, and flew out. the prospects were dismal. the most knowledgable espn gurus predicted an 0-5 start. pete carroll said he saw it coming. USC, and neb and fla st. and penn st and mich. and more cycle. Notre Dame as well as all of us will again be thanking God that CW gets it and really, really knows what he's doing. with no excuses. get on now.
There are too few black coaches? We need a quota for this now??
When does "he can do it, or he can't do it, and if he fails, he gets fired" come into play?
I'm waiting for the article that shows how white players are horribly unrepresented in college football (given that whites are still more than 70% of the population and about 80% of the college population).
I can't believe you've stooped this low to this Leftist clap-trap.
I have no problem with "he can do it or he can't do it, and if he fails, he gets fired", and believe it should work that way.
But I also believe the market for these things is inefficient. I believe there's a reason Turner Gill didn't get (or at least didn't feel he wanted) the Auburn job.
I'm not suggesting there be a Rooney Rule in college. I'm pointing out a method by which black candidates for jobs can move up in the ranks in just the manner you suggest. No preferential treatment or anything.
Since when has Weis been "afraid to run the ball?" The fact of the matter is, we ALL know ND haven't been able to run the ball for the past two years. The O-line needs to get better, but more importantly we need a RB who can run. ND will continue to get better and I am positive the negative bashing that has gone on here for the past two years will change drastically. I am looking forward to your articles at this time next year to see how much your opinion has changed moving forward. And why are ND alums far right zealots...you lost, get over it!
Who better to teach a running game to the Irish than Dr. Lou? If Weis can swallow some of his hubris, he would offer the offensive coordinator job to Lou, with Charlie still calling the plays game day. I guarantee ND's running game would improve dramatically, cause Lou can TEACH and the running game is his forte. And he'd be bringing in someone who's love of ND is unquestioned. And not a bad recruiter. Would Lou take it??? It sure would be worth asking.
...after the Hawai'i game...I truly believe that the problem with running the ball is poor tailbacks...although the offensive line hasn't helped much...the running backs are two and three star players...at best...if you saw the Cal game yesterday you saw a five star in Best...
...and by the way...I saw Cierre Wood play a couple of times this season...when you got him away from his very minor league and saw him play against even mediocre teams from a better league...he wilted...I don't see him as a five or four star...maybe a 3-1/2 star...
Thanks for showing us the moral high ground, Mike. Why not do us all a favor and celebrate Haywood's hiring as an end in itself rather than see it as some platform from which to profess your white guilt?
Pathetic pieces like this cause me to question why I even follow the Irish anymore. I can deal with the inherent condescension of Irish fans - indeed that is one of their more enduring qualities - but opinion pieces like this make me want to run for the exits.
No white guilt here. I'm merely tired of reading about the lack of black coaches while no one who allegedly cares about it does anything to try and solve it. Like other issues in our society, those who oppose it would rather keep the issue around to get things other things they want than get the issue resolved to others' benefit.
So you profess to "follow the Irish" and yet set yourself apart from "Irish fans". Interesting.
It's not a matter of white guilt, but rather of telling a story that is untold by the media powers that be.
Consider that, prior to Haywood's hiring at Miami (OH), Notre Dame's two main coordinators, its DL Coach (Oliver), it's TE coach (Parmalee), both Graduate Assistants and both Interns were African American.
That's "pipeline strength" for African Americans from entry level all the way to coordinator. Would that other universities had that same dedication to developing coaching talent by minorities, with the clear belief that performance, above all else, dictates opportunities for HC positions.
For example: who else would hire Oliver or Parmarlee?
In addition to the O-Line play, which everyone seems to agree needs improvement, I think one of the main issues with the running game has been the apparent commitment to Armando Allen. He has the raw speed to be a pretty effective special teams/return man, but as a RB, he's too easy to bring down, and lacks the strength to drag the pile when an extra yard is needed. Thinking back to Weis' "we're gonna pound it" comments from early in the season, I pictured a much more punishing runner(s) than what we saw throughout much of the 2008 campaign with Allen – something more along the lines of a Robert Hughes. In general, Hughes hit the holes hard against Hawaii, and produced nice chunks of yardage, setting up much more manageable 2nd and 3rd down calls. He may not have the speed and agility to be the answer long-term, but I like his overall running style better than Allen's, and hope that some of the incoming recruits are from a similar mold.
On another note, I couldn't help but notice how positively Mike Haywood's departure came off during the telecast. I don't know if he would have been fired after the season or not, but if so, we'd certainly have been force-fed the usual heaping helping of media doom and gloom. Instead, the commentators mentioned his winning the Miami job, and it always seems to reflect well on a program when its assistants move up the coaching ranks. Similarly, the Gatorade shower that Haywood received from the players was a happy, positive sendoff, in stark contrast to the bitterness and speculation that would surely have resulted from his firing. I wish Coach Haywood success, and for the Irish, I am thrilled that his departure, which could have been an ugly mess, ended up transpiring this way.
All in all, I thought the game was a much needed shot in the arm for the Irish. True, Hawaii was not a particularly formidable opponent, and we could go on about how much that in itself says about the state of ND football, and probably rightfully so. Still, on paper, the matchup was very close going in, and yet we handled them with ease. As an unashamed Weis supporter, I readily acknowledge that the team needs to turn the corner in 2009, and this was at least a good starting point. There were some terrific plays (can you say "Golden Tate"?), and it also appeared that the players were allowed to let their hair down a bit on the trip, and responded by playing as if they were relaxed and ready. This type of bonding can do a lot for team chemistry, and while chemistry alone doesn’t win football games, I think it’s very difficult to succeed without it.
Congratulations to the Notre Dame players and coaches for finally earning the bowl win that has eluded us for so long, and here’s hoping that we will soon be able to look back on Christmas Eve 2008 as one of the pivotal stepping stones in the Irish “Return to Glory.”
Eddie Willers said, "Pathetic pieces like this cause me to question why I even follow the Irish anymore"
How does the choice of following the Irish, your football team, have anything to do with an article (an opiniong piece) that you happen to have a disagreement with?
(and, which by the way, the article is correctly pointing out a few important things)
My goodness.
I'm not sure who or what is to blame for the following areas of concern addressed by some of you here.
1) I have been on here calling for John Latina's head quite a few times, but is it his fault?? Or is he hamstrung to this zone blocking scheme of CW's?? The guy is from the Joe Moore School, and one would assume that would take a guy like Latina pretty far. The two seem to be clashing here.....Zone blocking requires more athletic lineman, much like the Denver Broncos with Terrel Davis. Yet, it was Latina who decided to bulk these guys up, and Weis the MO-ron for letting him do that when his scheme uses zone blocking.
2) To the dude who has 420 in his name. Great number,but moving on.....How can you say if a running back is good or bad when you have a bunch of clumsy heavy-legged guys on the O-line like we do?? True...Armando Allen is easy to bring down sometimes, but he has been one block away from busting one many times. Anyone come away impressed with the size and speed of Jonas Gray?? Yes, it was against the 3rd sting of a weak team, but he seems to possess the speed and power combo. I think someone like Hughes will get better year after year. How about a "see ya later" to Asaph Schwapp?? Probably one of the more intimidating looking players in pads, but drastically overrated. All the moron had to do was catch a 2nd and 7 from Quinn against USC in 2005, and we would have won that game, and he couldn't do that. Ok, I will stop on the 2005 memories.
Also.... I too had heard about the level of comp. that Cierre Wood had been playing, and I wondered is he was overrated. I guess I would have to see the size of his O-line compared to the bigger schools that he struggled against. I guess we will see in the High School All-American game, and next year. OH WAIT....Our O-line sucks....How could I forget??!!
Greg, according to Mike Coffey it is "interesting" that I should divorce myself from the fans but not the team. It's all about the consistency, see? What was that saying about consistency and hobgoblins again? I forget...
I'll still follow the Irish but laugh at the fans. Who knows? Some day that dichotomy may sink in. Thanks for the entertainment, fellas.
I just find it entertaining when people talk about the "inherent condescension of Irish fans" in as condescending a manner as possible.
Nothing like criticizing a group of which you're allegedly a member, all while letting the outsiders know how you're "not one of those people". Some day that dichotomy may sink in, but I'm not betting on it.
I also love people who treat blog entries like these like they're hog-tied to their monitors with their eyes toothpicked open, and their only way out is to share their "outrage" with the world. At least we now spare ourselves the rantings of "anonymous".
Look on the bright side, Mike. Eddie seems to think that reading your blog is synonymous with Notre Dame fandom: "Pathetic pieces like this cause me to question why I even follow the Irish anymore...opinion pieces like this make me want to run for the exits.
"
Did you not know the power you wield?
Perhaps he fails to see the very real dichotomy that exists between reading (let alone agreeing with) an opinion piece and following the Irish. He need not do the former to do the latter.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home