Agreed. You can’t on one hand want max dollars to sell
by HENNAORNO (2024-04-23 21:05:45)

In reply to: Did he/she sell a practice and that was part of the  posted by Raoul


Your practice and then walk down the street, set up a new shop, and recruit all your former patients.

But a salon making a stylist sign a non-compete is ridiculous. There’s no economic compensation there.


Subway was making minimum wage workers sign them
by starburns  (2024-04-24 10:33:31)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

They have their place, but it's not the one they have been occupying.


Well they are sandwich making artists
by HENNAORNO  (2024-04-24 11:24:28)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

And the company has to protect that secret method of assembling a sandwich in front of you. Come to think of it, the sandwich wrapper might be a non-compete agreement that was just imposed on me for witnessing said assembly.


An excellent reason to have payouts
by Ndwahoo  (2024-04-23 23:03:01)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Structured to pay out annually, or after a certain number of years in a trust. 5 years to have your equity or funds vest. Or retention bonuses instead of guaranteed up front payouts.

No reason to keep a doctor from moving down the street if the person who bought the practice implements unethical practices which the doctor can not decline.

A monetary penalty for breaching the deal is not a noncompete.