In reply to: I liked his article but have a question posted by drmurray
I've been told frequently by mentors of mine that I need to exhibit more patience with people who don't see the future as quickly as I and most other highly intuitive people do. Most people are highly sensory and they need a lot more evidence. It's mistaken for being self-serving or just plain dumb, but some people really just need more data points. Driskell is one of those. Be kind. He got there eventually.
You really should save your ire for Sampson and Hansen. You can invest every once of vitriol you can muster in them. Prister also thinks you're a racist BTW.
He was all in the Kelly,and was dismissive of criticisms of Kelly. He postured that his opinions were to be given greater weight than people with a triple digit IQ because he was a short ti.e assistant coach at a community college.
He has no credibility. He gets zero points.
But he launched a lot of vitriol at the people who arrived at the correct conclusion much much more quickly than he did. I didn't see too many mea culpas sent in those directions -- more like blocked Twitter accounts.
He's a putz.
He did the same thing with Weis.
He doesn’t know shit about fuck
I knew him to be a gigantic douche for years. I was surprised when he began to turn on Kelly. Should've guessed it was for bullshit reasons.