I think the espionage charge is indicative of that.
by wpkirish (2024-02-08 19:58:53)

In reply to: They did.  posted by IAND75


I think Lindsey Graham was one person complaining that what happened was not espionage. The only problem is the statute actually defines the willful and continued possession of the classified documents as espionage. It may seem unfair in this context but certainly can understand why it might be written like that. Avoids the government being required to prove they were shared with anyone.

Of course Lindsey never thought to change the statute he finds so wrong during his almost 30 years in DC.