I think they mean the agreements with RCID
by ravenium (2024-03-28 17:11:57)
Edited on 2024-03-28 17:13:54

In reply to: Disney was forced to declare that their agreements were  posted by G.K.Chesterton


"A trial was set to begin in June. But now, Disney holds that prior agreements are null and void and intends to negotiate a new deal that likely would be beneficial to Disney’s development plans in the area."

This sounds more like mutually beneficial hatchet burying. Of course the most optimal outcome for Disney would be "nothing ever happened" but this seems to make both parties satisfied. I don't know how you could see this as Disney eating crow.

I Am Not A Lawyer of course, it is known.




Replies: