The irony seems self-evident to me.
by kormal (2024-04-01 12:20:03)

In reply to: Regardless of the overall merits  posted by ratinatux

Cannot Reply Return to Political

People are presumably upset because 1) Biden acknowledged Trans Day of Visibility and 2) that happened on Easter this year.

The whole point of the day is to acknowledge that trans people exist. So it’s deeply ironic that the argument seems to be Biden shouldn’t acknowledge this because of people who might be offended by the acknowledgement. That’s pretty much the point of having the day in the first place.

As to the rest of your nonsense I haven’t accused anyone of being transcidal.

I think your response makes my point
by ratinatux  (2024-04-01 12:42:13)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

Your original post talks about people’s preferences being put over trans people’s “right to exist.” Your response to me says you never said anything about people being transcidal. Either I do not understand what a subjugation of a “right to exist” means (surely possible, but right to exist seems to have a clear meaning), or you used hyperbole that does not match your intended meaning.