No Roe held that after the first trimester the State had the
by wpkirish (2024-04-02 15:24:44)

In reply to: Wouldn't restoring Roe v. Wade effectively make abortion  posted by krudler


ability to impose regulations in the secind trimester and prohibit in the third trimester.

If the origina post meant for any reason in the first trimester I apologize but typically I see this to support the argument Dems want to permit it all the way until birth for any reason whatsoever.


Nope you interpreted my post correctly, thanks. *
by krudler  (2024-04-02 17:31:59)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply