That is not what the advcates are putting on the ballot.

That is not what the advcates are putting on the ballot.
by wpkirish (2024-04-09 15:54:24)

In reply to: There's a few posted by shillelaghhugger

I have linked the filing below. The language pretty clealy prohinits state regulation pre-viability without extraordinary medical measures absent a compelling government interest. After viability it allows state regulation except in the case of the physical / mental health of the mother.

One could argue this is more restrictive than Roe.

Click here for link at https://apps.arizona.vote/electioninfo/assets/47/0/BallotMea

Replies:

It's not more restrictive than Roe - ndtnguy 2024-04-11 10:46:58
- I think it is more restrictive because it does not adopt the - wpkirish 2024-04-11 12:18:40
  - But that hadn't been the law since 1992 - ndtnguy 2024-04-11 15:13:35
  - Some medical context - AquinasDomer 2024-04-11 13:38:15
    - I think your last line is where my "faith" in the system - wpkirish 2024-04-11 14:49:00
      - (link) - Grace91 2024-04-11 18:45:34
        Also sort of my point this person didn’t need an exception - wpkirish 2024-04-11 22:16:31
        As i said I dont speak in absolutes * - wpkirish 2024-04-11 21:47:13
        Fair point. Was noting that as much as we hope that ghouls - Grace91 2024-04-11 22:25:36
        Read the whole thing appreciate the response, * - wpkirish 2024-04-12 09:17:20
That's one health care professional - shillelaghhugger 2024-04-09 18:29:12
- I will simply say two things. - wpkirish 2024-04-09 19:07:30