I think it is more restrictive because it does not adopt the

I think it is more restrictive because it does not adopt the
by wpkirish (2024-04-11 12:18:40)

In reply to: It's not more restrictive than Roe posted by ndtnguy

simple trimester approcach of Roe. If the medicine detemrines babies are viable before the end of the first trimester then the "dates" move up.

As for the strict scrutiny you are right that was not in those cases.

My main point is this is not aboriton on demand until the point of birth. Is it possible there is a medical provider somewhere who could be convinced a pregnant woman was so stressed out about the prospect of being a mother they would abort in the 8th month? I suppose anything is possible.

As I have said elsewhere I think this idea shows a great disrespect for women in gneral and health care providers.

Replies:

But that hadn't been the law since 1992 - ndtnguy 2024-04-11 15:13:35
Some medical context - AquinasDomer 2024-04-11 13:38:15
- I think your last line is where my "faith" in the system - wpkirish 2024-04-11 14:49:00
  - (link) - Grace91 2024-04-11 18:45:34
    - Also sort of my point this person didn’t need an exception - wpkirish 2024-04-11 22:16:31
    - As i said I dont speak in absolutes * - wpkirish 2024-04-11 21:47:13
      - Fair point. Was noting that as much as we hope that ghouls - Grace91 2024-04-11 22:25:36
        Read the whole thing appreciate the response, * - wpkirish 2024-04-12 09:17:20