I’m confused.
by kormal (2024-04-17 16:10:59)

In reply to: Inskeep commented on internal NPR goings-on without  posted by Barrister

Cannot Reply Return to Political

Where are you getting that Inskeep didn’t have authorization? He’s been publishing that Substack for awhile now.

The bit about how he was spontaneously asked by
by Barrister  (2024-04-17 16:15:09)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

a panel moderator what he thought about the recent events - I'm guessing he didn't have advance permission to tell the audience his opinions on the Berliner piece.

And I didn't see any indication Inskeep had permission to air his complaints about Berliner on the Substack, but maybe he did have management's okay on that - he should have noted it if he did, given that was the purported basis for Berliner's suspension without pay.