I'll post the breakdown if I can find it
by AquinasDomer (2024-01-03 17:10:17)

In reply to: I suspect the real issue has been the conversion of  posted by Barrister


But they broke down which faculty signed the problematic statement that flirted w being pro hamas vs who signed onto a more reasonable statement.

The STEM plus econ bucket was about 95% in the reasonable statement camp. Non econ humanities was about 50:50.

I think for the hard sciences the dei statement is an annoying thing you do and doesn't matter much. For the humanities it's become a problem.


"For humanities it's become a problem"
by Dutch  (2024-01-03 18:51:53)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Cannot reply

It's a humanities issue, so it appears that it is a real problem. I'm far from an academic, but it boggles my mind that real academics are not standing up and proclaiming the weakness of the oppressor vs. oppressed antiracism/critical theory model.