In reply to: ND's Land Acknowledgement... posted by Kbyrnes
acknowledge both the stolen land and the 272 slaves who were sold to help pay off the school's debt. In our group that day were two students who were descendants of one of the slaves.
Didnt seem so trivial that day.
From whom did native Americans steal land? Wooly mammoths? The Flintstones?
You’re welcome to research the topic.
You’re such a delight to chat with, by the way. We really appreciate your contributions.
natives were all big happy family? They were fighting wars/displacing one another long before honkies invaded the continent.
Just a silly position to take.
Of course various tribes came and went from various parts of this country as the tribes' power ebbed and flowed. There's a reason the Crow hated the Lakota Sioux, to name one of many examples. And the Crow themselves pushed the Shoshone off their land in the first place.
Or rather, people can just concede the point that the European settlers of this country didn't treat the Indians very well.
You morons will never get off your merrygoround of whataboutism.
But the Indians fought each other too!
land and mocked a poster for suggesting otherwise by asking if they stole it from the Flintstones or woolly mammoths. Don’t try to dodge that now.
The point is that these land acknowledgment statements are dumb and ignore that Native Americans took land under “the old rules” — that is, before about 1945, where might made right and you could take land through conquest without remorse — just like everyone else.
But we’d lose out on a lot of virtue signaling opportunities in the present. And we don’t feel THAT bad about it after all.
In reality I have no earthly idea what your problem is, or why anyone tolerates you at all.