Shocking that Ivy league admins aren't keen to investigate

Shocking that Ivy league admins aren't keen to investigate
by Barrister (2024-01-04 12:25:52)
Edited on 2024-01-04 12:35:05

In reply to: It's relevant because I don't think politically-motivated posted by FaytlND

Cannot Reply Return to Political

members of their own club.

Wasn't the president of Stanford just ousted over research misconduct?

I guess my point is, if the misconduct is there, then I don't really care who brings it to light. Human nature suggests to me that critics or competitors are more likely to (a) go looking and (b) go public if they find wrongdoing.

(ETA: Should the Michigan cheating scandal be discounted because Ohio State was first to raise the alarm?)

I have no problem with that. Sunshine is the best disinfectant. Perhaps Harvard should've done their homework during the hiring/search process - this could have been avoided.

Replies:

Then I guess we're going to disagree. - FaytlND 2024-01-04 12:39:57
- So the solution to the problem of "rot" in higher education - Barrister 2024-01-04 12:57:54
  - The solution would be to investigate and - FaytlND 2024-01-04 13:03:57
    - I assume outside parties had no say in Prof. Gay's - Barrister 2024-01-04 13:09:10
      - It would be naive to think outside parties had no "say". - FaytlND 2024-01-04 13:15:39
        She was caught plagiarizing work on multiple occasions. - krudler 2024-01-04 16:23:12
        So are you pleased she got canned because - FaytlND 2024-01-04 17:13:41