This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

I watched it as well. Very complete and educational. I by eriendfan

liked how they had Robert Ray, Trump's attorney, laying out how Trump's lawyers would defend him. Lots of "First Amendment Speech" and "he did not know he lost or believe he lost the election". And some crap about how impossible it is to determine his "intent".

1) The First Amendment does not let you yell FIRE! in a crowded theater.
2) There are many instances where Trump let his guard down and admitted he lost - all before Jan 6.
3) Jack Smith has charged it in a way that intent might not be important.

How can you watch that show and come away with anything but believing Trump is guilty as charged and a danger to the country.