This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
It’s the money part of it as explained by manofdillon below. by lilbart
I believe the case against Trump is legitimate. I just can’t believe the person in charge of bringing the case and the DA who appointed that special prosecutor acted in this manner. This is an incredibly important case - it was important that that the people prosecuting it were above board and beyond reproach. Instead, she appointed her ducking booty call, went on vacations with him, and reimbursed him travel expenses in cash.
It absolutely affects the case and puts into peril an incredibly important case that needed to be prosecuted. I just can’t believe neither of them thought this would come back to bite them in the ass.