This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

I think the problem is similar to the dump Biden idea. by wpkirish

I think Trump will have enough delegates for the nomination before any felony conviciton. Even with a conviciton I dont see Trump voluntarily dropping out and that would force the party leaders to remove him somehow (not even certain they could). How do they call for removing the candidate their voters ovwhelmingly want to be the candidate for a conviction in a case they have spent months saying was a political witch-hunt?

I think Haley's own campaign evidences this problem. She says she is less concerned with his legal problems than turning the RNC into his own piggy bank. She refuses to say whether she would support him if he is the nominee after saying she would do so earlier in the race.