This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

I think there's some truth to this by ravenium

However, it's a very complex problem with a lot of layers. Here's the way my thinking goes:

---

Weather is an overstated problem - one does not see the same homeless numbers in, say, Alabama as one does in California.

Ahh, but what about housing costs, which are far lower in AL than CA?

That only impacts the people who can sustain a roof over their heads. What about the "problematic" ones (mental illness, drug use, etc)?

They are heavily encouraged to go where they will not be hassled. This may mean bussing, but it also means "that place is far more lenient and I can get away with stuff, let's go there". I don't think there's a specific "policy" that encourages this, but there's a paralysis of "we can't do x" where other states decide "we can do X, fuck them".

Thus you get A) economically homeless, due to housing and B) homeless due to antisocial behavior, rolled up into a monolith that people go round and round chatting about.

---

So what attracts the antisocial contingent to the west coast? I'd say it's more of a sentiment than actual policy:

"hard drug use should be destigmatized"

"rehab is a choice and only when the person is ready, it's their right to choose when"

I think those statements and sentiments are what have caused the greatest harm, together with the "bundling" of the economically homeless into the monolith. You can't help A and B in the same way.