This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
My concnern is without any evidence all we are doing is by wpkirish
undermining the trust. Is it possible yes but the same question would apply to Orr as Iasked below. Having raised the idea there was fraud what happens when Burke ONeill is declared the winner? Does he then say all is good?
From what I am hearing both sides expect her to win by about 1,000 votes so there will obviously be a recount but I give credit to both campaigns for the profesional manner in which they have handled it.
And yes some of the issue is the retirement of David Orr who was the consumate professional with years of experience and presumably many of his top people.