This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

To whom is your post responsive? by IrishJosh24

Did someone claim "only the right did damage"? I don't see it.

I see vermin claimed "quite simply more damage has been done by the right."

This phrasing implicitly admits the left also did damage, but it quantifies the damage caused by each side and reaches a conclusion about which side caused more harm. You can debate the conclusion. You can debate whether the enterprise is worthwhile at all. But finding two examples of "the left," apparently embodied by Newsom and Cuomo, also doing damage doesn't even respond to vermin's point, let alone "rebut" it.