This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

You are right, that is a fine piece on her plagiarism and on by sorin69

the reasons why there was so much resistance to "owning" it. The writer is rightly critical of the hypocrisy of her defenders.

About outside critics: on the one hand, it is true that the motive of the messenger doesn't really matter to the truth of the accusation. I'm sure Rufo has what I would call malign intent. Ultimately irrelevant. Professional dishonesty in the worlds of science and scholarship can't be rationalized away, though there are doubtless degrees of gravity. On the other hand, it is alto true that universities -- and I don't just mean the Ivies plus Stanford -- are under severe pressures from the right wing to succumb to what the business world would call a hostile takeover attempt. It's a grave threat to their mission and must be resisted. Donors can't appoint faculty -- or remove them.

I started this thread not with plagiarism in mind but regarding why universities have fallen into a pit of their own making. The temptation to pontificate on the problems of the day, joined with pedagogical pampering and identity politics, explains a lot to me.