Post Reply to Political

This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

Message:

HTTP Link (optional):

Poster's Email (optional):

 


Post being replied to

I think your first point deserves more discussion. by Dutch

I'm hopeful that the current spotlight on Harvard and Ackman's essay will lead to a constructive dialog. I agree whole heartedly that, "There is no agreed upon definitions so everyone has a different idea of what they are discussing which can make conversations difficult." That needs to change and hopefully Ackman's essay will cause a step in the right direction.

This might be part of the Rorschach test, but I did not read Ackman's essay as presenting an argument of diversity efforts generally. Rather, I read it as an argument against the "oppressor/oppressed framework" that is rooted in critical theory, has evolved in critical race theory, is fundamental to Kendi's racist/anti-racist dichotomy, and is integral to some peoples' understanding of DEI. As Ackman wrote, "Then I did more research. The more I learned, the more concerned I became, and the more ignorant I realized I had been about DEI, a powerful movement that has not only pervaded Harvard, but the educational system at large. I came to understand that Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion was not what I had naively thought these words meant."

As a condition precedent to making real improvements, we need to agree on what the relevant words mean.