Irish Search for a Win in Boston

Notre Dame returns to the road on Saturday evening to play the Boston College Eagles in a regionally televised contest. The 2-1 hosts rolled over two lower-tier opponents before being shut out at home by Virginia Tech last week. This defeat triggered a change at quarterback, where true freshman Chase Rettig will make his first collegiate start in place of veteran Davis Shinskie. Notre Dame’s lineup remains largely intact, and the Irish hope to break their three game losing streak in the first of five very winnable October games.

Both teams have struggled on offense against the stronger teams on their respective schedules. The Eagles have committed eight turnovers in three games, and their usually productive running game could muster only 70 yards against the Hokies. The swap of Rettig for Shinskie, who threw for 279 yards against Notre Dame last season in a 20-16 loss, is a surprise at this early stage of the season. The message is that Coach Frank Spaziani must believe his team can run against the Irish, and he hopes that Rettig will protect the ball so as not to put his defense in a difficult position.

The Notre Dame offense is still in search of balance. Recent opponents have defended the passing lanes while paying a decreasing level of attention to the Irish running game. While Dayne Crist appears to be productive from a statistical standpoint, any quarterback with only a few games under his belt won’t win many games by throwing 50 passes against defenses that know what is coming. 

One area of concern for the Irish is the health of tailbacks Armando Allen and Jonas Gray. Allen may be limited this week and Gray is not expected to be available. This would not only detract from the running game, but Allen is the only back who has demonstrated the ability to pick up the blitz in pass protection.

NOTRE DAME’S OFFENSE vs. BOSTON COLLEGE’S DEFENSE

The key matchup here is in the trenches. The Eagles will try to control the line of scrimmage with its front four and drop the rest into an umbrella style pass coverage. Alex Albright is the primary pass rushing threat while tackles Kaleb Ramsey and Damik Scafe will try to clog the middle. BC’s linebackers are the strength of the defense. Mark Herzlich returns after a one-year battle with cancer, and he is just rounding into form after suffering a stress fracture in his foot just prior to the season. Sophomore middle linebacker Luke Kuechly, who was all over the field against Notre Dame last season, leads the team in tackles with 12 per game.

The Irish will have to force the Eagle safeties and talented linebacking corps to respect the run, or Crist will be throwing into the teeth of coverage all night. This strategy worked perfectly for Boston College in the 2008 meeting between these teams, and it will be effective again unless Notre Dame wins its share of the individual battles up front .

The Eagle secondary is comparable to the teams the Irish have faced this season. Senior cornerback DeLeon Gause has returned an interception for a touchdown this season, and free safety Wes Davis represents an excellent last line of defense. Notre Dame will seek to spread the ball around and make Boston College pay if they overplay Michael Floyd or Kyle Rudolph. That means Theo Riddick must continue his progress as the slot receiver and Crist must also be able to find T.J. Jones in single coverage situations. The Irish must also be willing to stretch the field with a few deep passes to keep the defense honest.

An area that has been discussed extensively since the Michigan game is the willingness of Coach Brian Kelly to allow Crist to run the ball out of the read option. Crist’s head injury and the uneven performances by the backup quarterbacks a few weeks ago have curtailed that element of Notre Dame’s offense, but it has allowed defenses to effectively disregard this threat. At 1-3 on the season, perhaps it is time for Notre Dame to take a few calculated risks.

BOSTON COLLEGE’S OFFENSE vs. NOTRE DAME’S DEFENSE

The BC coaching staff apparently decided that the future is now, so the highly recruited and strong-armed Rettig is going to start. He enrolled in January as has been through spring and fall practices with the team, but the plan of attack will probably be relatively simple. The running game must work for the Eagles this week if they are to have a chance to win. Notre Dame would love to force 40+ passes from a true freshman, but that won’t be Spaziani’s approach. The Irish should accept Rettig’s promotion as a physical challenge to stop the run.

Meanwhile, the Boston College offensive line is led by huge senior tackles Anthony Costanzo and Rich Lapham. The guards and center have not found their stride as yet, and the running game has not yet been as productive as in past years. The line has also allowed eight sacks, which is somewhat alarming given the overall level of competition.

The Eagles will feature 5’10” Montel Harris, who will run behind fullback James McCluskey, a 6’2” 250 pound bruiser. When Rettig drops back to pass, he will look for Clyde Lee and 6’6” Ifeanyi Momah, who are primarily short range receivers, and 6’4” deep threat Jonathan Coleman.  Harris is also used extensively as a receiver out of the backfield, and Rettig may check down to him frequently on Saturday. The Eagles may throw short, safe passes on first down to create manageable second and third down situations for Rettig, and the Irish cornerbacks should not be afraid to react aggressively by jumping certain routes if he stares down his primary receiver.

 This offense has experienced problems this season with third down conversions (only 31%) and time of possession, where they have an uncharacteristic deficit. Red zone efficiency is also down, as evidenced by a subpar touchdown rate of 25% (compare this with Stanford’s 16 of 19 prior to the Notre Dame game).

Nose tackle Ian Williams will be an important player for the Irish. If he performs well in the middle, Manti Te’o should approach last week’s tackling statistics and become very well acquainted with Harris. While the Irish outside pass rushers may have trouble getting to the quarterback against BC’s tackles, it would be a worthwhile gamble to bring additional pressure up the middle against the freshman. If Notre Dame allows Rettig to get comfortable in the pocket and gain confidence, he has the arm and the talent to hurt them.

SPECIAL TEAMS

The Irish have struggled in the area in recent weeks as coach Mike Elston has missed time due to illness. Elston is back now to provide renewed emphasis in this area. It is likely that new players will be inserted on the various return teams to inject some life into these underperforming units. Kicker David Ruffer continues to perform well, and punter Ben Turk is slowly becoming more consistent.

Boston College has competent specialists in punter Ryan Quigley and kicker Nate Freese. Gause is the return man for both punts and kickoffs, but his averages (4.4 and 18.3 yards, respectively) are not very impressive. The coverage units appear to be performing well.

SUMMARY

The Eagles will attempt to smother Notre Dame’s passing game and dare the Irish to run. If they are successful, we can expect a low-scoring affair that will reduce the pressure on Rettig to perform beyond his age and experience level. This outcome is not out of the question, however, as Rettig reportedly was interested in the Irish and recruiting interest was not reciprocated by the previous staff. The young man will be extremely motivated to excel in this contest, and he may surprise Notre Dame if he can maintain poise in the pocket.

This is an important game for the Irish, not only because BC is a beatable opponent but also because this team must demonstrate that it can find a way to win a close, hard-fought battle. Too many narrow defeats can become a disease, while a breakout performance on Saturday could be the springboard for a series of wins in October and possibly beyond.

Here are a few questions that may determine the outcome:

Will the Eagle defensive line win the battle up front and force the Irish away from the running game?

Can the Irish force Rettig to make mistakes and play like a freshman?

Will Notre Dame show improvement on special teams, particularly in the return game?

Can the Irish cornerbacks effectively cover BC’s tall receivers?

Which team will be more efficient on third down and in the red zone?

Will Crist be allowed to run the ball?

Can the Irish get past the “almost” stage and put together a complete, winning performance?

PREDICTION

Notre Dame has more weapons on offense, but Kelly must utilize them in order to keep a good Boston College defense honest. The Eagles do not have one of their better offensive teams this year. They are rebuilding the line and apparently will use the rest of this season to prepare Rettig for 2011. Still, they will play this game with passion and can win if the Irish attack remains predictable. Allen’s health may be an important factor in this equation. If he cannot start and play to his usual standard, it will definitely affect the outcome. In the final analysis, Notre Dame needs a win badly and should be able to get past the Eagles in another close contest, where the score looks very familiar with last year’s result.

NOTRE DAME 20 BOSTON COLLEGE 16

Categories

21 thoughts on “Irish Search for a Win in Boston

  1. Time to stop the talk and walk the walk. ND must not dismiss Kelly after one season. But he really should start delivering.

  2. I simply can’t see BC’s offense being able to score enough points to beat us. I expect ND to score in the mid to high 20’s with a good deal of that due to playing on short fields due to BC’s offensive woes. As crazy as it sounds, I look for David Ruffer to have a big game, getting us at least 3 FG’s considering our offense is some abysmal in the red zone.

  3. I tend to agree, Vannie. Both teams have shown great inconsistency, so I don’t see a blowout either way. A close ND win or a close BC win is likely to occur. BC will be pumped playing a home game at night. That crowd will be drunk, loud and obnoxious (more towards the visiting fans than the football team). If we do not get out in front of BC early, quiet the crowd and take the momentum, BC could hang around long enough to beat us. If we get up by 10 or more early and shutdown their running game, I think we stand a good chance of winning.

  4. It is time for Brian Kelly to put together a well coached game as well. He has made some por play calling the last 2 games and especially last game against Stanford. I am tired of hearing about how much talent this team has offensively and show us nothing for it. Kelly needs to slow the game down offensively and start winning the battle of the time of possession, the defense is literally wiped out by the 4th quarter due to the 3 and outs by the offense. Slow it down and give our defense some support. They played a heck of a game last week and if the offense could have scored or at least converted a 3rd down a few times ND may have pulled off an upset.

  5. I woke up this morning to a surprise: the needle on my gut-o-meter had just barely ticked over to the green side. It’s an Irish win on Saturday night.

    Disclaimer: the warranty on my gut-o-meter expired years ~ that’s YEARS ~ ago. Results may vary.

  6. We’re FOUR GAMES IN to the new coaching staff. The panic that has emerged here is more reflective of the horrible job of coaching done by the last 3 coaches than it is by what we’ve seen so far. We’re 1-3, and with a play here or there we could be 3-1 with a loss to a team that will most probably play in a BCS bowl.

    Give the team and coaches a little time. This is a good chance for them to get things going, but if they don’t its not the end of the world.

    Kelly has 3 years. Then let’s start judging him.

    • PJ (Michigan) says:

      Yes, and for 5 years we heard how many of the problems with Weis’s teams were the result of Willingham’s deficiencies. Fortunately, BK, unlike BO, is man enough not blame everything on his predecessor. Kelly has to deliver. He has talent sufficient to be better than 1-3.

      • PJ, you are correct about BK not being the type to blame, but to believe that he could turn this thing around in a couple of months is a bit too “rose colored glasses” for me. We do have the talent and we now have a solid college coach. Give him time to turn around the culture of the team and get this thing rolling in the right direction. As far as the 1-3 – vs – 3-1 with a few plays, well, many 1-3 teams can say something like that. BK’s Irish are not part of the Boob Weisingham era at this point. Time will tell if BK will need to be added to that mix, but let’s give it enough time to make a real evaluation and not just an emotionally charged rant like many Irish “faithful” are doing 4 games into BK’s tenure. Note: I’m not saying you are making such a rant. I’m just tired of the constant “hold me I’m Irish” coming from so many who want instant gratification. We had that with Willingham and Weis. I’ll take real results and a true change in organizational culture after some growing pains over instant gratification based on smoke and mirrors.

        • I think we are seeing that one offseason was not enough for Kelly to train (develop) the current roster into the team he needs to execute his plan. What is Kelly’s plan? For 10+ years he has hung his hat on an aggressive offense that scores points quickly and a defense that makes enough stops (i.e. gives the ball back to the offense often enough) to win ballgames. I’m not sure if this plan will win national titles, but I believe that the current defense is good enough for a 10-win season. The problem is that the offense is not fully functional yet. There are simply not enough players on offense playing “fast” enough. There is no QB depth and we aren’t making the correct reads often enough and fast enough. The receivers are not exploding off the line of scrimmage, firing out of breaks, catching the ball, planting a foot, and tearing up the field. They are playing fast and hard, but look at the most effective spread offenses in the country. We are not there yet. The OL is not playing aggressive and consistent enough for this offense to be at full strength. There is only one RB playing aggressively and with enough consistency. At every offensive position (OL, RB, WR, TE, and QB) we need to be more decisive and more aggressive. I think that this all goes back to developing unconscious competence and we aren’t there yet. One offseason did not give us enough repetitions to play at “full speed” at every position. This is our problem and it’s why we have been beaten by good teams with less talent (UM, MSU, and Stanford). They all have multiple seasons under the same coach (extra repetitions = improved execution). I believe that we will get there by next season. If we don’t, ND football is in BIG trouble.

  7. It’s been a long time in waiting and I think it’s about time an Irish defense take advantage of inexperience on the other side of the ball with some timely pressure. I think it’s quite obvious BC is going to commit to the running game with Montel Harris and try to grind it out. If ND can contain the run and force 3rd and median to 3rd and long situations, bring the pressure and force Retting to get rid of the ball early ND should be in good shape. I don’t think they need the sacks just force him to throw early. Offensively, Cris needs to be somewhat of a threat on the option read. If ND can show that and keep BC off balance the offense should find it’s groove and be productive.

    “GO IRISH”

  8. P.J, please leave politics out of ND football. As your hero RR said, “facts are stubborn things,” and it’s pointless to illustrate them to you. (do not respond, I will not argue with tea partiers) However, I do like your taste in football, and belive the Irish could use a bc win to springboard themselves to an 8-3 record come usc. GO IRISH!!!

    • Please take your own advice and leave the “RR” and “tea partiers” comments in your mind and off the boards. Other than that, I agree with you. Lets see what an improved and confident 8-3 Irish (assuming a win over Utah) can do to the losing streak against the condoms…

  9. This will be a good, tight game early on, but I expect BC to get behind since it has yet to show a sustained ground game against a solid competitor. Michael Floyd has been playing fumblerooskie this year and its about time he stepped up and had the big gain. Part of it may be a timing issue with Crist, but if he’s to be a first round draft pick, its time for him to catch and deliver. Also, expect a better performance from ND at TE this week.

  10. Big game sat night nothing would be better then beating BC at chestnut hill the boys need this one bad!!!. Hope they come out with a little more emotion then last week , the next 2 weeks will determine what kind of season they end up having im a loyal ND fan but a realist just want to see some emotion and good play hopefully a WIN!!!!!! will cure that GO IRISH!!!!!!!!!!

  11. Does anyone remember the last time we played decently in Boston? I think it was many, many moons ago. I predict a close BC win to continue our misery.

  12. My prediction: close game for the first quarter, but then the Irish start to move the ball consistently. We will still lose the time of posession battle, but it will not be as lopsided as it has been. In the end, the defense plays disciplined ball and begins to show significant improvement against the run. Christ spreads the ball effectively and is allowed to run a bit more. We run enough to keep BC honest and that opens up holes for Rudolph, Floyd, Riddick and Goodman to exploit. By game’s end, the outcome is not in doubt, though it is not a true blowout.
    ND – 33
    BC – 17

  13. I have lost all faith in ND football after last weeks humiliation. ND only wins if they make a wrong turn and head over to Boston University and play their team

    ND 26- BU 23 in overtime

  14. A wait and see attitude this game and the rest of the season needs to happen due to this is BK’s first season.

    A win would be great but…..

  15. Ignor the W’s and notice the little things. . . (1) plays are being sent in much quicker than the offensive guru (Charlie Weiss) used to send them in. . .the no huddle offence. (2) We are capable of putting up points (not quite there yet in order to compete in the big league) (3) Kickoffs are deep and sometimes in the end zone. (4) We have a field goal kicker for a change! (5) We have a punter! (6) Defense is maturing each game (minus a couple of big plays each game) (7) We have a spread offence. (8) Christ is developing (only his 4th start). (9) Running backs are beginning to find holes and fight for yardage (got to hold onto the ball tho) (10) Ver few penalties. . .maybe only one against BC? The IRISH are getting better each game. Brian Kelly developes players. Can’t wait to see what he can do with his own recruits the next few years.