Syracuse players including Spallina suing the NCAA...
by flanner96 (2026-07-28 18:45:30)

.... for another year of eligibility.
Someone will have to explain this to me since Spallina is playing professional lacrosse right now. Isn't the eligbility question moot once you start collecting a paycheck from a professional sport?


ADVERTISEMENT

Yeah not sure on Spallina...but...
by TheOptimist  (2026-07-29 12:13:46)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |  Report Post |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Could this open the door for seniors-to-be getting a free 5th year? I.e. Could athletes that have played each of their first 4 years -- like Lyght -- theoretically come back for a 5th year?


For "true" seniors, yes.
by USAF_Irish  (2026-07-29 15:40:29)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |  Report Post |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

If an athlete didn't redshirt at any point during their career, they can choose the new rules which would give them a 5th year of eligibility.


The current state of the judge's ruling
by SixShutouts66  (2026-08-03 19:48:09)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |  Report Post |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

is that the 5 for 5 is retroactive to include players who had just used 4 years of sports eligibility in 4 years. It is no-go for any of those "potentials" who have signed a pro contract in the meantime. So most of the Syracuse lacrosse players are Out.