Again, this has been a point of debate for at least 20 years

Again, this has been a point of debate for at least 20 years
by 3rdSt (2019-01-21 09:54:34)

In reply to: But it is 2019. posted by mustangman

Why now? Maybe they finally had someone suggest a workable alternative to removing them, maybe they just finally got a round to doing something - I seriously doubt that 2019 has anything to do with it. If you think this is a new issue, you’ve not been paying attention.

Replies:

That is my point. - mustangman 2019-01-21 10:02:10
- And I’m saying that this wasn’t a ‘rush’ decision. - 3rdSt 2019-01-21 10:06:55
  - But it is selective. - mustangman 2019-01-21 11:18:22
    - Aren't careful decisions supposed to be selective... - ufl 2019-01-21 11:51:56
      - I think it was a hollow and spineless decision. - mustangman 2019-01-21 18:26:07
        You make up your own narrative. Good for you. * - 3rdSt 2019-01-21 23:03:28
      - It’s both an unstoppably broad slippery slope - captaineclectic 2019-01-21 14:43:50
        Yes. * - mustangman 2019-01-21 18:26:45
        I think you may have missed the conflict... - ufl 2019-01-22 09:05:34