So there’s a lot of wrong in this one post

So there’s a lot of wrong in this one post
by DakotaDomer (2020-11-25 20:23:45)

In reply to: But you're not demonstrating that understanding. posted by ndtnguy

But I’ll stick to this

1. Your first sentence is false - I can’t “only” think of it in any one context and I’ve already made that point
2. Your second sentence is false - who said anything about adultery?
3. The rest of your description appears to be false as was pointed out in this thread...the song was not written for a movie or to fit a plot of a movie - the songwriter wrote it for parties. It doesn’t really matter to me because intent is not the debate here...no one thinks the songwriter intended for this to be a loveable song about how he tries to have sex with his wife without her consent. But it certainly should matter for you since it appears to be the majority of your argument. And according to the evidence in this thread...it’s wrong.

My post has zero to do with the writer and his wife

Though I think you are correct that it was written in advance and the borrowed for Neptune's Daughter. But that was tangential.

The rest of your response is just an obtuse refusal to engage with my actusl point, which is disappointing.

I don’t have to engage when you’re factually wrong

And if your argument and evidence is reliant on you telling me how I think....I’m allowed to tell you you’re wrong and be done with it.

So as your “substance” is an incorrect assumption about me and a (tangential) description of the plot of a movie you didn’t see...how much more do you expect anyone to engage?

Be done with it - keep your opinions, no one ever said you couldn’t have them.