The criteria should be reduced spread, not vaccination.
by ndroman21 (2021-04-15 16:10:37)
Edited on 2021-04-15 16:12:49

In reply to: Seems strange to me  posted by Jvan


The former should naturally follow the latter, of course, but why set criteria based on something that should happen rather than what is happening?

I suspect that by fall, the mask requirement will be able to be dropped based on greatly reduced spread.

Ongoing surveillance testing seems prudent for awhile.