In reply to: What nobody has explained is - How do you have a conf. champ posted by bluengold07
Particularly with grant of rights deals and TV contracts with each conference with different networks in place.
This is why the notion of eliminating the conference title games is a total pipe dream. Plus they are cash cows for the SEC, ACC, and Big 10. There's no way they would give those up. If they go to eight, it will be WITH conference championship games.
Or are we just going to kick to the "at-large" curb schools like Utah, TCU, Maryland, Arkansas, Syracuse, etc etc.?
8 conferences of eight teams.
7 non-conference games ... 5 conference games ...
Conference champions play the weekend after thanksgiving.
Seeding based on record and strength of schedule.
Yes, ND would end up in a conference. Under this framework, that's ok.
This is 64 teams. If you divorce football from the all-sports conference, I could see schools like IU or KU walk away from football as a resource drain.
I don't really care about UCF.
Boston Col.
Syracuse
Rutgers
W. Virginia
Virginia
Louisville
Va. Tech
Miami
Maryland
Duke
Wake Forest
N. Carolina
NC St.
Clemson
Ga. Tech
Florida St.
Penn St.
Pitt
Ohio St.
Michigan
Michigan St.
Notre Dame
Indiana
Purdue
Northwestern
Illinois
Wisconsin
Iowa
Missouri
Minnesota
Kansas
Nebraska
Washington
Wash. St.
Oregon St.
Oregon
Utah
BYU
Colorado
Air Force
Cal
Stanford
UCLA
USC
Arizona St.
Texas Tech
TCU
Arizona
S. Carolina
Florida
Georgia
Tennessee
Kentucky
Vanderbilt
Auburn
Alabama
Miss. St.
Mississippi
LSU
Arkansas
Texas A&M
Ok. St.
Oklahoma
Texas
12 divisions of 8 for 96 "power" teams - 7 Division Games 4 Non-Division and allow 4 "at-large" playoff bids or 5 non-division games and top 4 get a first round bye.
Possible better alternative might be divisions of 9 so you have even number of home and road games.
I'd think it would be 7 conference games and 5 non-conference games.
"return to smaller conferences." I'm just quibbling now, I suppose.