That's not considered human error?

That's not considered human error?
by NDBass (2019-02-04 10:42:54)

In reply to: I actually agree with him there. posted by PeteatND

Making the decision you outlined is still a human error. It wouldn't have been made because the NFL wanted LA in the Super Bowl or he himself wanted LA in the Super Bowl. If that isn't human error, it is at worst the stupid refereeing symptom of not wanting to call a penalty/foul at the end of a game that they would've called at any other time during the game.

The conspiracy theories are where the gripes fly off the rails and lose any sort of sympathy one might have for the Saints. I have none, so I find the whole thing hilarious.

Replies:

I guess it's semantics. - PeteatND 2019-02-04 12:28:45
- I can dig it. * - NDBass 2019-02-04 12:35:29
it's a systemic problem - jt 2019-02-04 11:03:07
- I get that and agree. - NDBass 2019-02-04 11:16:56
  - agree. Close to incompetence - jt 2019-02-04 12:13:04