The unnecessary roughness call in the first drive was a joke and not even close to a foul

for that matter, anyone else. Enlighten me.

Assuming it was Book to which you are referring, roughing the passer was out as soon as he was driven to the sidelines. (I don't think it was roughing the passer even if he stayed in the pocket, but he didn't.) As for unnecessary roughness on Book, that has to be something so egregious. The three Georgia defenders were there less than a fraction of a second after Book released the pass.

Unless, you are going with targetting or a likewise penalty.

It seemed like something they were consistently looking for.

And it nullified a Boykin TD that would have put the nail in the coffin 28-10. Instead we kicked a FG that made it 24-10 and kept Michigan within striking distance.

The WR was the one who touched it illegally because he was covering the TE on LOS. He needed to be off the LOS.

If the WR covered up the TE, then the TE is ineligible. You stated the WR was ineligible.

I was referring to what they called. They called illegal touching on the TE (#89) who didn't touch the ball.

It was an illegal formation. The WR covered the TE. Making the TE ineligible..he was also blocking downfield well before ball was thrown. They could have chosen a number of penalties.

Because he's ineligible, he's a blocker, and thus is allowed to engage in blocking activity. He just can't do it downfield on a pass.

Like a Michigan receiver?