This same crew made the same call against ND last year
by NDFaninMadTown (2019-09-23 00:19:46)
Edited on 2019-09-23 00:20:23

In reply to: On the "illegal touching" call on GA;  posted by hometown fan


And it nullified a Boykin TD that would have put the nail in the coffin 28-10. Instead we kicked a FG that made it 24-10 and kept Michigan within striking distance.

The WR was the one who touched it illegally because he was covering the TE on LOS. He needed to be off the LOS.


That cannot be correct
by hometown fan  (2019-09-23 07:10:47)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

If the WR covered up the TE, then the TE is ineligible. You stated the WR was ineligible.


They kinda screwed it up..
by NDFaninMadTown  (2019-09-23 10:52:30)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

I was referring to what they called. They called illegal touching on the TE (#89) who didn't touch the ball.

It was an illegal formation. The WR covered the TE. Making the TE ineligible..he was also blocking downfield well before ball was thrown. They could have chosen a number of penalties.