That cannot be correct
by hometown fan (2019-09-23 07:10:47)

In reply to: This same crew made the same call against ND last year  posted by NDFaninMadTown


If the WR covered up the TE, then the TE is ineligible. You stated the WR was ineligible.


They kinda screwed it up..
by NDFaninMadTown  (2019-09-23 10:52:30)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

I was referring to what they called. They called illegal touching on the TE (#89) who didn't touch the ball.

It was an illegal formation. The WR covered the TE. Making the TE ineligible..he was also blocking downfield well before ball was thrown. They could have chosen a number of penalties.