I'm confused

I'm confused
by captaineclectic (2018-03-10 09:58:42)

In reply to: Thanks for the polite reply. posted by austindomer

Cross wrote:

"try to understand that scienter is not the primary issue"

and then you wrote:

"no one on this board has any direct knowledge of Swarbrick's awareness of the matter, therefore no one can conclusively claim that he has scienter"

And then jt wrote:

"Andy's point is that him knowing about any abuse is not the issue; the issue is whether he helped create an environment that enabled the guy to abuse"

and then you wrote:

"My point is that there's no evidence (as of now) that Swarbrick had knowledge of the abuse."

So you are repeatedly being told that the issue is not what Swarbrick knew, and repeatedly arguing against the point no one is making.

What part are you not getting?

Replies:

I misread Cross' post. * - austindomer 2018-03-10 22:46:18
- Fair enough, thank you. * - captaineclectic 2018-03-11 09:48:15
exactly. I'm not sure what the problem is here * - jt 2018-03-10 18:07:36