I don’t think his privilege assertions will work.
by Bruno95 (2018-12-11 10:42:48)

In reply to: For those of us fortunate enought to not be attorneys  posted by dulac89


The privilege protects communications, not identities. If the client states that a policy was developed with counsel, the lawyer cannot invoke the privilege to deny the fact of his involvement. If the client says a lawyer received/reviewed given reports, no privilege shields the lawyer from identifying himself as the person in question.

I don’t know about Baker Daniels’s or Swarbrick’s legal exposure, though I’d be surprised if the firm isn’t sued. I think the later attorney, Himsel, is in deep shit.


Replies: