Are there any plausible explanations that Swarbrick could

put forth that would indicate that he's not morally culpable in the USAG scandal? I don't particularly like him based on his public pronouncements and the arrogance he projects about various issues. I'm not a lawyer so I can't weigh in as to whether his actions would/could/should trigger any civil or criminal penalties. That said, I don't think that legal culpability should be the hurdle as to whether he keeps his job. It seems to me as though he is morally culpable, at a minimum, and ND should part ways with him post haste. Is it simply that Jenkins and/or the BOT lack balls?