In reply to: It's already been unsuccessfully challenged in the past. posted by rockmcd
So, presumably, any challenge would be one vote down out of the gate
to would-be professional male athletes.
That said, actual S.Ct. precedent is murky enough that it doesn't seem out of the question that a different circuit (particularly the 8th) could rule the other way and set-up a split. Perhaps Squee, PJ, and Moose can crack open some beers and guide the current court in the right direction.
like this.
Maybe Roberts were just perplexed on how to call balls and strikes on this one.