It is a limited ruling
by TerryD (2019-03-10 10:49:07)
Edited on 2019-03-10 10:49:38

In reply to: you're the only person I've heard claim that  posted by jt


"Among the items U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken said these athletes may receive are scholarships to complete undergraduate or graduate degrees at any school. The judge also appeared to open the possibility of athletes being able to receive cash or cash-equivalent awards based on academics or graduation, albeit under some constraints.

At the same time, however, her 104-page ruling prevents athletes from receiving unlimited benefits, as the plaintiffs had hoped.

The NCAA "may continue ... to limit compensation and benefits that are unrelated to education," Wilken ruled.

She also said that the association may adopt a definition of compensation and benefits that are “related to education.”

The association can limit "academic or graduation awards of incentives, provided in cash or cash-equivalent" but that limit cannot be "less than the maximum amount of compensation that an individual could receive in an academic school year in participation, championship, or other special achievement awards (combined)."


It seems a limited ruling and a less than complete victory for the plaintiffs. Nothing Earth shattering.

It seems to mean/will cause much less than the all encompassing changes the plaintiffs wanted and some predicted.




Replies: