I think he's dog whistling on Omahadomer on TPG

Omahadomer said "But you might be watching the greatest ND QB in history by many objective measures." By QB productivity stats, Omahadomer could turn out to be correct.

Replies:

Is that the complete quote? - ACross 2019-04-15 13:39:06
- here's the whole post - El Capitan 2019-04-15 15:35:47
  - Does he later specify the objective measures which he uses - Father Nieuwland 2019-04-15 22:27:26
  - I like OmahaDomer and I wish that he posted here - jt 2019-04-15 18:18:23
- for those who believe in the rule of completeness - ACross 2019-04-15 14:52:47
  - What am I missing? - garbageplate 2019-04-15 14:58:09
    - I take issue with his use of the term, "greatest" - Jvan 2019-04-15 15:21:56
      - Most prolific would be a more appropriate description * - DawsonMayes871 2019-04-16 07:58:36
        Dump off passes are not prolific * - Jvan 2019-04-16 15:24:36
        What does that have to do with anything? - DawsonMayes871 2019-04-16 21:25:01
        truthfully it's mainly a sports talk radio type of topic - jt 2019-04-17 01:10:26
        That's fair * - DawsonMayes871 2019-04-17 09:33:20
      - Ian would be very effective in a Holtz offense too - ACross 2019-04-15 19:44:19
      - To be clear, I don’t agree with the post either - garbageplate 2019-04-15 16:21:29
      - and that's like why OD qualified it with - El Capitan 2019-04-15 15:36:59
        Distinction without difference * - 2ndstreeter 2019-04-15 18:55:36
        I disagree with you both - Jvan 2019-04-15 15:42:42