According to the UCLA beat writer for the LA Times
by 105Marquette (2020-06-27 12:23:38)
Edited on 2020-06-27 12:24:19
Post Reply Return to Rock's House

Under Armour has informed UCLA's athletic department that it intends to get out of its $280MM apparel deal. UCLA's AD said they will fight to keep the contract in place.

Not sure what the root is, but I'd wager that the $325+MM in restructuring costs that UA announced has something to do with it.

Fortunately for UA, much of their deal with us was paid
by dignan  (2020-06-27 16:45:58)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Up front with (now) nearly worthless stock options.
Would be nice for Swarbrick to provide a little transparency
by ACross  (2020-06-27 23:51:19)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

On how ND fared in its contract with UnderArmour.

Dog doo.

I’ve been wrong before but
by AaronND  (2020-06-28 18:59:20)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

I’m pretty sure the lack of transparency tells us exactly how ND has fared in the UA contract. If it was anything resembling good we’d have heard all about it.

Swarbrick & transparency in the same sentence? Unremarkable *
by NDFanSince81  (2020-06-28 10:05:46)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post