Could you elaborate on your objections?

Could you elaborate on your objections?
by TripleDomer (2020-08-04 09:17:55)

In reply to: you should see what the NCAA is trying to do with name, posted by jt

It seems like the NCAA is agreeing to permit individual NIL licensing under three conditions: (1) no institutional involvement; (2) no use of institutional IP; and (3) market value-capped compensation (https://ncaaorg.s3.amazonaws.com/committees/ncaa/wrkgrps/fslwg/Apr2020FSLWG_Report.pdf). That seems reasonable to me. Ian Book could be paid to appear in a Basney Honda or Gurley Leep Kia commercial, but he couldn't be paid more than a market rate and couldn't wear his jersey. Likewise, Prentiss Hubb could become an influencer on the social media platform du jour, but he wouldn't have access to ND-produced video.

It appears that the NCAA doesn't think a framework currently exists to permit group licensing (e.g., for use in video games). That isn't surprising to me either.

Click here for link at http://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/media-center/news/board-

Replies:

The “no institutional involvement” prong, which I know has - 1NDGal 2020-08-04 14:23:30
- No institutional involvement is necessary for at least one - tf86 2020-08-04 16:58:43
- I will answer your question for you - jt 2020-08-04 14:30:14
  - It’s not 1988 anymore, and don’t patronize me. I chose my - 1NDGal 2020-08-04 14:46:20
    - your thought was complete bull - jt 2020-08-04 15:01:20
      - Oh no..... - jerryd 2020-08-04 21:59:28
Oh wow, the NCAA release says that it's all above board! - jt 2020-08-04 10:07:58
There needs to be some regulation for sure. - 84david 2020-08-04 09:51:31
- the top 40 teams or so should split off - jt 2020-08-04 14:03:44