Not aimed at you, but seriously?

Not aimed at you, but seriously?
by tar (2020-11-25 10:47:07)

In reply to: The UC game next year looks more and more interesting. posted by G.K.Chesterton

Cincinnati? North Carolina? Any number of other putrid teams on our schedule that people are clutching their pearls over? These teams suck. If ND can’t curb stomp them, then ND isn’t really that good. There is little to be interested in with most of the weak ass teams on the schedule this year or in future years, save the occasional game against a decent team like Clemson.

Wisconsin in GB would have been intriguing for the novelty of a rare opponent in a hallowed venue.

I know Lou Holtz used to build up opponents, but it was his schtick. We should be more discerning and have higher expectations.

Replies:

Don’t we play Ohio State/Clemson both in 22 and 23? - athlete37 2020-11-25 14:54:27
- Yes - HTownND 2020-11-25 16:07:49
  - Eh, complaining about 2022 and 2023 is at the margins - KeoughCharles05 2020-11-25 16:54:40
  - I think UNC in Brown’s 4 year will be top 15 to 20, along - athlete37 2020-11-25 16:16:19
    - “save the occasional game against a decent team... - tar 2020-11-25 18:45:00
      - Our 2022 schedule will be a top 5-10 SOS * - athlete37 2020-11-25 18:49:20
        We'll see - HTownND 2020-11-25 18:54:21
        And our traditional non ACC slate has also hit the shitter - tar 2020-11-25 21:04:12
        Pitt and Miami sucked for most of Ara's career - ODSCHOOL 2020-11-26 12:32:54
        Shitter’s full * - athlete37 2020-11-26 12:00:33
        Shitter’s full * - athlete37 2020-11-26 10:08:05
Clemson just "decent". Pleeeez! * - Wolfetone 2020-11-25 12:09:04
- They haven’t beaten anyone good yet. * - tar 2020-11-25 14:02:13