O’Leary scores off a turnover and it’s 1-0,

UM scores and now it’s 3-1, er 1-1 *

And ND answers immediately *

And f@ck *

As does UM. Ugh. *

And that’s the Minnie I remember. Always reverting to thugs. *

Another beautiful chance hits the darn pipe *

Hard earned and another waived off *

Another joke by these refs.

You spend five minutes reviewing what should be a good goal and wave it off, then not even review what should be an open and shut goal. This should be 3-0.

Last year we led the B1G in disallowed goals. Let’s repeat!

just for fun.

Is our hockey-only B1G membership a factor? Is water wet?

[OK, I don’t have verification on that stat. Feels correct, though.]

I hate hate hate playing the conspiracy game, but...

You really have to wonder sometimes. Especially winning the tournament in both years.

It's a safe bet that you are correct.

It still feels like we're just being tolerated, but just barely, as members of the Big Integer. I think they're hoping we just go away.

YO FOLKS! How bout Score & Time every once in a while? *

Headed to the second OT

So officially a tie per NCAA/PairWise purposes.

Headed to OT *

I forgot about the weird B1G OT rules. *

Still tied. 3:37 to go. *

1:28 to go. FWIW we have totally outplayed MINN. SOG 30-20

Faceoffs 33 to 19.

And it’s actually at least 4-2, so...

Bonus hockey! *

And we go to 3 on 3 *

Liking our controlled fire and aggression. 4:30 left *

EFF Minnesota. 3-2 they win. Oh, well done B1G. You betcha. *

Livid. This game never should’ve been in overtime. *

I will never see hockey OT as a “bonus”. Hockey is torture,

OT is extra-special torture.

First OT done *

ND 2, UM 2, Refs -2, 10:20 remaining

I’m having a hard time letting this go.

I missed

The apparent goal that you referenced that wasn't reviewed. What happened?

Goalie covered, but the puck squirted through him...

...refs blew the whistle while the puck was still moving, then didn’t review it. According to the broadcast crew, that was a reviewable play. They were all shocked that they didn’t take a look at it, especially after the marathon review early on.

They were shocked by both outcomes

They spent the first 3 minutes of the five-minute review stating it was clearly a goal.

And despite the fact they were Big Ten employed announcers they were willing to state what was obviously correct.

I hate replay and I hate the Big Ten. The only problem is the majority of our fanbase -- at least in hockey -- prefers seeing the Irish play almost any Big Ten team over almost any other team. Boston College would be the only consistent exception to that rule.

Did the puck go in on the 2d attempt after the early whistle

Did it actually go in or is Jackson just angry for what could have happened?

2-2 with 7:40 left

It did cross the line *

Ok so that’s ND 2 MINN 2 B1G Refs 3 *

Oh you’re talking about the SECOND early whistle...

No, I don’t think that one went in. But like you said, it could’ve turned into a goal.

MUCH BETTER PEEPS! GRACIAS! *

OT a’comin’. Me no like. 20 seconds left. *

Glad I wasn't watching then. *

2-2. 11:36 remaining *

2-2 11:48 in 3rd *