In reply to: What's bad about MLS influence? posted by Mr Wednesday
Though handling of higher-end U.S. players is more a general divergence than something within the USSF's orbit—and in a sense, I'd also argue that it's a positive for U.S. soccer in the longer term, because it can expand the pool by making soccer a more attractive sport (you can earn the big bucks without having to go abroad to do it).
Your last point is very true, but in the 4 to 8 to 12 years, the "longer term" before that really happens where the talent catches up with the pay, is why that argument means complacency with not qualifying for the World Cup...which to me is the point of USSF and all National Teams.
Conversely, the Bundesliga I and II and DFB in Germany see a WC win as the end-all for their actions. MLS isn't quite on board in the same way if they wait for the talent to catch up to the pay.