Just watched it
by wcnitz (2020-10-05 07:30:17)

In reply to: It was originally called a penalty and red card.  posted by NDBass


So...I'm not sure what the interpretation was here, because Cavallini clearly went into the back with the shoulder/arm. Even if you think the foot contact that came after was a foul (I don't think it was), the attacker still committed a foul first.

This one reeks of a referee who tweaked a decision instead of correcting it, because he was so over-the-top wrong with the initial one.


Replies: