Part of the problem

Part of the problem
by wcnitz (2026-02-09 05:36:42)

In reply to: Don’t disagree. But it rarely if ever is in EPL. posted by ndroman21

There's this attitude there that 'well, if you get the shot off, no harm no foul.' If the ball is still in play, and the foul occurs after the shot/pass, then it's a foul. Just call the damn thing.

Also, I don't know why people are making such a big deal of the late red card. Why should Haaland get a goal after he commits a foul? That's how it should work. Advantage not realized, go back to the original foul, it's a DOGSO, let's move on with our lives.

Replies:

It wasn’t Haaland’s goal. - NDMike2001 2026-02-09 08:40:37
- No goal was scored. Haaland fouled Szoboszlai before. - ndroman21 2026-02-09 12:29:08
  - Essentially - wcnitz 2026-02-09 13:03:12
- Yep, not Haaland's goal - wcnitz 2026-02-09 08:45:41
  - Then Haaland should have been shown yellow. And red. * - NDMike2001 2026-02-09 09:35:45
    - Second caution for Haaland why? - wcnitz 2026-02-09 11:05:24
      - Unsporting, tactical...you decide. - NDMike2001 2026-02-09 12:35:08
        UB covers a range of things - wcnitz 2026-02-09 13:01:38
        I didn't say every shirt pull was yellow. - NDMike2001 2026-02-09 14:02:24
        But it was after Szloboszlai's foul - ndroman21 2026-02-09 12:40:02
        Yes you can. Which is the entire point of the argument. - NDMike2001 2026-02-09 12:48:43
    - Once bring back for Szosbalai red - CuzTeahan 2026-02-09 09:51:28
      - Well that's basically why he gets yellow. - NDMike2001 2026-02-09 10:41:17