Yep, not Haaland's goal

Yep, not Haaland's goal
by wcnitz (2026-02-09 08:45:41)
Edited on 2026-02-09 08:46:08

In reply to: It wasn’t Haaland’s goal. posted by NDMike2001

Misspoke on that. But it was his foul on the defender trying to clear it (and Haaland was DOGSO fouled, no question about that). 100% correct call was made here.

VAR can intervene on any direct red card situation. The goal cannot be given because a foul was committed by City while it was still in play. You CANNOT give that goal, period.

Replies:

Then Haaland should have been shown yellow. And red. * - NDMike2001 2026-02-09 09:35:45
- Second caution for Haaland why? - wcnitz 2026-02-09 11:05:24
  - Unsporting, tactical...you decide. - NDMike2001 2026-02-09 12:35:08
    - UB covers a range of things - wcnitz 2026-02-09 13:01:38
      - I didn't say every shirt pull was yellow. - NDMike2001 2026-02-09 14:02:24
    - But it was after Szloboszlai's foul - ndroman21 2026-02-09 12:40:02
      - Yes you can. Which is the entire point of the argument. - NDMike2001 2026-02-09 12:48:43
- Once bring back for Szosbalai red - CuzTeahan 2026-02-09 09:51:28
  - Well that's basically why he gets yellow. - NDMike2001 2026-02-09 10:41:17