So to be clear...

So to be clear...
by El Kabong (2022-11-27 13:08:52)

In reply to: I’m certain we could’ve struck a similar deal posted by Garbageplate

Post Reply Return to The Pit

...it's your position the Big 10 or the SEC or the Pac12 or the Big12 would have signed a deal with Notre Dame saying that in exchange for an average of five games per year scheduled against their teams, Notre Dame would get full access to all of their bowl slots and a place for all their non-FB teams to play.

If that's your position, suffice it to say I disagree.

And also suffice it to say all those conference have dogmeat teams ND would have to play as part of any of those hypothetical deals. That you prefer those dogmeat teams to the ACC's dogmeat teams really isn't relevant to the conversation.

Replies:

I have no idea whether the terms would’ve been the same - Garbageplate 2022-11-27 13:12:43
- What evidence do you have to support this claim? - Ty Webb 2022-11-27 13:17:00
  - Common sense - Garbageplate 2022-11-27 13:20:57
    - Critical thinking would be open - nd67 2022-11-27 17:29:01
    - Common sense would indicate - Ty Webb 2022-11-27 13:27:43
      - We already were playing 3-4 B10 games per year - btd 2022-11-30 18:26:21
      - I reject the notion that we needed a full tie-in for bowls - garbageplate 2022-11-27 18:03:44
        Bowls want "certainty" with regard to teams. That is why - wpkirish 2022-11-28 14:13:20
        What minor bowls? - Ty Webb 2022-11-27 22:12:32
        Not sure- it's a hypothetical scenario - garbageplate 2022-11-28 11:45:59
        Yes, they were waiting for us........... - Ty Webb 2022-11-28 15:05:42
        Hockey only had 6 teams and is a sport where the dominant - wpkirish 2022-11-28 14:20:51
      - Don't forget the PAC 12 would triple and the Big 12 would - SECTION12 2022-11-27 16:21:24
      - This seems the commonsense argument to me * - turtle17 2022-11-27 14:15:27