What evidence do you have to support this claim?

What evidence do you have to support this claim?
by Ty Webb (2022-11-27 13:17:00)
Edited on 2022-11-27 13:18:23

In reply to: I have no idea whether the terms would’ve been the same posted by Garbageplate

Post Reply Return to The Pit

What leads you to believe that we would have had deals on the table from other conferences?

You cite that ND is coveted but there is little chance the BIG would have cut a deal with us where we get access to their bowl games, etc. Same with the SEC.

Maybe the Pac 12 or Big 12 may have but then how are they any different than the ACC in terms of one of your other issues with the ACC - slop opponents?

Replies:

Common sense - Garbageplate 2022-11-27 13:20:57
- Critical thinking would be open - nd67 2022-11-27 17:29:01
- Common sense would indicate - Ty Webb 2022-11-27 13:27:43
  - We already were playing 3-4 B10 games per year - btd 2022-11-30 18:26:21
  - I reject the notion that we needed a full tie-in for bowls - garbageplate 2022-11-27 18:03:44
    - Bowls want "certainty" with regard to teams. That is why - wpkirish 2022-11-28 14:13:20
    - What minor bowls? - Ty Webb 2022-11-27 22:12:32
      - Not sure- it's a hypothetical scenario - garbageplate 2022-11-28 11:45:59
        Yes, they were waiting for us........... - Ty Webb 2022-11-28 15:05:42
        Hockey only had 6 teams and is a sport where the dominant - wpkirish 2022-11-28 14:20:51
  - Don't forget the PAC 12 would triple and the Big 12 would - SECTION12 2022-11-27 16:21:24
  - This seems the commonsense argument to me * - turtle17 2022-11-27 14:15:27