I'm not sure 1) moves the needle with the players

I'm not sure 1) moves the needle with the players
by jt (2026-01-16 18:11:07)

In reply to: In no particular order. posted by USAF_Irish

(though it might, I have just never seen/heard of them asking for that). I definitely would support it, however.

I think that 2) is unlikely, just because losing the ticket sales would cost both sides too much. Perhaps if they found a way to increase it (not sure how), that would work.

I'm with you on 3), I just don't know how they would do that. More of a focus on divisional play?

4) is absolutely the minimum starting point. The owners have never wanted to open the books. They've asked for a cap and expect the players to take their word for it in terms of the revenues; that's bullshit.

Replies:

Would this be enough for the books? - NDBass 2026-01-16 19:12:09
- read the first reply - jt 2026-01-16 21:10:16