This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.

Important notes on articles:

• Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
• Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
• If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.

Post being replied to

I do think they are saving Garnsey for the stretch run. by irishdoc01

He was beat up and ineffective as the 2017 season went on. By the end of the year he was the third best attackman on the team, behind Wynne and Gleason. I suspect Garnsey is on board with how he is being used, similar to the way he was used as a freshman. He is still on the #1 extra man offense and is on the field in crunch time. He wears his emotions on his sleeve and his body language does not suggest that he is frustrated. He's buying in. His health in conference play, conference tourney and hopefully NCAA tourney will be welcome improvement on last year.