This is not a vent board or any other kind of therapy. Before you hit the POST button, ask yourself if your contribution will add to the level of discussion going on.
Important notes on articles:
- Please do not copy entire articles into your post; rather, provide links to them.. We are now links-only for ALL Internet publications. If only a small portion of the article pertains to your post, Fair Use allows you to copy those one or two paragraphs, provided you cite the author's name and the publication for which he writes. Otherwise, put a link in the HTTP Link box.
- Even if you're copying a reference to an article, provide a link to the page from which the article came. We're trying to cut down on duplicate topics, and the posting process will check the link to your article to see if it's already being discussed on this board. At the very least, you'll save yourself some grief on the boards.
- If your first reaction after reading the article you're going to share is the author is uninformed / stupid / a jerk / all of the above, it's not worth sharing with anyone. Not every article needs to be discussed. The more the hair-pulling articles are discussed (e.g. ESPN Page 2), the more the authors will write hair-pulling articles.
Post being replied to
Agree with your last sentence, but . . . by tf86
I think if you were going to make the case for a team that missed the field being in, you have to go with Cornell over High Point. 10-5 overall record, with wins against us and Towson. All losses came to teams in the NCAA tournament (Penn State, Syracuse, Penn and Yale twice).
As to your last sentence, I think the key could be more conferences adding the sport. If two more conferences got AQ bids, that would up the total to 11. In that event, I think they'd expand the NCAA tourney to 24 teams, which means more at-large bids available.